Articles

under review

• Endress, A. D., & Bonatti, L. L.. (under review). Single vs. multiple mechanism models of artificial grammar learning. .
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-Bonatti-Models,
  author = {Endress, A.D. and Bonatti, L. L.},
  title = {Single vs. multiple mechanism models of artificial grammar learning},
  year = {under review},
  owner = {endress},
  timestamp = {2015.05.27}
  }

• Endress, A. D.. (under review). Is there evidence for the size principle? A critical review. .
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-Size-Principle,
  author = {Endress, A. D.},
  title = {Is there evidence for the size principle? {A} critical review},
  year = {under review},
  owner = {endress},
  timestamp = {2013.09.10}
  }

2014

• Endress, A. D.. (2014). How are Bayesian models really used?. Cognition, 130(1), 81–84.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-Frank-rebuttal,
  author = {Endress, A. D.},
  title = {How are {B}ayesian models really used?},
  journal = {Cognition},
  year = {2014},
  volume = {130},
  pages = {81--84},
  number = {1},
  doi = {10.1016/j.cognition.2013.09.003},
  owner = {endress},
  timestamp = {2013.09.10}
  }

• Endress, A. D., & Potter, M. C.. (2014). Large capacity temporary visual memory. J exp psychol gen, 143(2), 548–65.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-WM-Capacity,
  author = {Endress, A. D. and Potter, M. C.},
  title = {Large capacity temporary visual memory},
  journal = {J Exp Psychol Gen},
  year = {2014},
  volume = {143},
  pages = {548--65},
  number = {2},
  owner = {endress},
  timestamp = {2013.05.26}
  }

• Endress, A. D., & Potter, M. C.. (2014). Something from (almost) nothing: buildup of object memory from forgettable single fixations. Atten percept psychophys, 76(8), 2413–2423.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-WM-LTM,
  author = {Endress, A. D. and Potter, M. C.},
  title = {Something from (almost) nothing: Buildup of object memory from forgettable
  single fixations},
  journal = {Atten Percept Psychophys},
  year = {2014},
  volume = {76},
  pages = {2413--2423},
  number = {8},
  owner = {endress},
  timestamp = {2014.05.01}
  }

• Kovács, Á. M., & Endress, A. D.. (2014). Hierarchical processing in seven-month-old infants. Infancy, 19(4), 409–425.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{kovacs-hierarchy,
  author = {\'Agnes Melinda Kov\'acs and Ansgar D Endress},
  title = {Hierarchical processing in seven-month-old infants},
  journal = {Infancy},
  year = {2014},
  volume = {19},
  pages = {409--425},
  number = {4},
  owner = {endress},
  timestamp = {2014.05.19}
  }

2013

• Endress, A. D.. (2013). Bayesian learning and the psychology of rule induction.. Cognition, 127(2), 159–176.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-BayesRules,
  author = {Endress, Ansgar D.},
  title = {Bayesian learning and the psychology of rule induction.},
  journal = {Cognition},
  year = {2013},
  volume = {127},
  pages = {159--176},
  number = {2},
  month = {May},
  abstract = {In recent years, Bayesian learning models have been applied to an
  increasing variety of domains. While such models have been criticized
  on theoretical grounds, the underlying assumptions and predictions
  are rarely made concrete and tested experimentally. Here, I use Frank
  and Tenenbaum's (2011) Bayesian model of rule-learning as a case
  study to spell out the underlying assumptions, and to confront them
  with the empirical results Frank and Tenenbaum (2011) propose to
  simulate, as well as with novel experiments. While rule-learning
  is arguably well suited to rational Bayesian approaches, I show that
  their models are neither psychologically plausible nor ideal observer
  models. Further, I show that their central assumption is unfounded:
  humans do not always preferentially learn more specific rules, but,
  at least in some situations, those rules that happen to be more salient.
  Even when granting the unsupported assumptions, I show that all of
  the experiments modeled by Frank and Tenenbaum (2011) either contradict
  their models, or have a large number of more plausible interpretations.
  I provide an alternative account of the experimental data based on
  simple psychological mechanisms, and show that this account both
  describes the data better, and is easier to falsify. I conclude that,
  despite the recent surge in Bayesian models of cognitive phenomena,
  psychological phenomena are best understood by developing and testing
  psychological theories rather than models that can be fit to virtually
  any data.},
  doi = {10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.014},
  institution = { Cognitive Sciences, 43 Vassar St, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
  Electronic address: ansgar.endress@m4x.org.},
  language = {eng},
  medline-pst = {ppublish},
  owner = {endress},
  pii = {S0010-0277(12)00280-6},
  pmid = {23454791},
  timestamp = {2013.03.28},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.014}
  }

2012

• Endress, A. D., & Potter, M. C.. (2012). Early conceptual and linguistic processes operate in independent channels. Psychol sci, 23(3), 235–245.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-rsvp-lt,
  author = {Endress, A. D. and Potter, Mary C.},
  title = {Early conceptual and linguistic processes operate in independent
  channels},
  journal = {Psychol Sci},
  year = {2012},
  volume = {23},
  pages = {235--245},
  number = {3},
  doi = {10.1177/0956797611421485},
  owner = {endress},
  timestamp = {2011.09.12}
  }

2011

• Endress, A. D., & Hauser, M. D.. (2011). The influence of type and token frequency on the acquisition of affixation patterns: implications for language processing.. J exp psychol learn mem cogn, 37(1), 77-95.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-TypeToken,
  author = {Ansgar D Endress and Marc D Hauser},
  title = {The influence of type and token frequency on the acquisition of affixation
  patterns: Implications for language processing.},
  journal = {J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn},
  year = {2011},
  volume = {37},
  pages = {77-95},
  number = {1},
  month = {Jan},
  abstract = {Rules, and exceptions to such rules, are ubiquitous in many domains,
  including language. Here we used simple artificial grammars to investigate
  the influence of 2 factors on the acquisition of rules and their
  exceptions, namely type frequency (the relative numbers of different
  exceptions to different regular items) and token frequency (the number
  of exception tokens relative to the number of regular tokens). We
  familiarized participants to either a prefixation pattern (where
  regulars started with /ZaI/ and exceptions ended with /ZaI/) or a
  suffixation pattern (where regulars ended with /ZaI/ and exceptions
  started with /ZaI/). We show that the type and the token frequency
  of regular items and exceptions influence in different ways what
  participants can learn. For the exceptions to be learned, they have
  to occur sufficiently often so that participants can memorize them;
  this can be achieved by a high token frequency. However, a high token
  frequency of the exceptions also impaired the acquisition of the
  regular pattern. In contrast, the type frequency of the patterns
  seemed to determine whether the regular pattern could be learned:
  When the type frequency of the regular items was sufficiently high,
  participants successfully learned the regular pattern even when the
  exceptions were played so often that 66\% of the familiarization
  items were exceptions. We discuss these findings in the context of
  general learning mechanisms and the role they may play in language
  acquisition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).},
  doi = {10.1037/a0020210},
  language = {eng},
  medline-pst = {aheadofprint},
  owner = {endress},
  pii = {2010-18053-001},
  pmid = {20804286},
  timestamp = {2011.01.24},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020210}
  }

• Endress, A. D., & Wood, J. N.. (2011). From movements to actions: two mechanisms for learning action sequences. Cognit psychol, 63(3), 141–171.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-Action-Axc,
  author = {Ansgar D Endress and Justin N Wood},
  title = {From movements to actions: Two mechanisms for learning action sequences},
  journal = {Cognit Psychol},
  year = {2011},
  volume = {63},
  pages = {141--171},
  number = {3},
  owner = {endress},
  timestamp = {2010.09.09}
  }

2010

• Endress, A. D.. (2010). Learning melodies from non-adjacent tones. Act psychol, 135(2), 182–190.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-tone-tps,
  author = {Ansgar D. Endress},
  title = {Learning melodies from non-adjacent tones},
  journal = {Act Psychol},
  year = {2010},
  volume = {135},
  pages = {182--190},
  number = {2},
  owner = {endress}
  }

• Endress, A. D., Carden, S., Versace, E., & Hauser, M.. (2010). The apes’ edge: positional learning in chimpanzees and humans.. Anim cogn, 13(3), 483-495.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-Chimps,
  author = {Ansgar D Endress and Sarah Carden and Elisabetta Versace and Marc
  D Hauser},
  title = {The apes' edge: positional learning in chimpanzees and humans.},
  journal = {Anim Cogn},
  year = {2010},
  volume = {13},
  pages = {483-495},
  number = {3},
  abstract = {A wide variety of organisms produce actions and signals in particular
  temporal sequences, including the motor actions recruited during
  tool-mediated foraging, the arrangement of notes in the songs of
  birds, whales and gibbons, and the patterning of words in human speech.
  To accurately reproduce such events, the elements that comprise such
  sequences must be memorized. Both memory and artificial language
  learning studies have revealed at least two mechanisms for memorizing
  sequences, one tracking co-occurrence statistics among items in sequences
  (i.e., transitional probabilities) and the other one tracking the
  positions of items in sequences, in particular those of items in
  sequence-edges. The latter mechanism seems to dominate the encoding
  of sequences after limited exposure, and to be recruited by a wide
  array of grammatical phenomena. To assess whether humans differ from
  other species in their reliance on one mechanism over the other after
  limited exposure, we presented chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and
  human adults with brief exposure to six items, auditory sequences.
  Each sequence consisted of three distinct sound types (X, A, B),
  arranged according to two simple temporal rules: the A item always
  preceded the B item, and the sequence-edges were always occupied
  by the X item. In line with previous results with human adults, both
  species primarily encoded positional information from the sequences;
  that is, they kept track of the items that occurred in the sequence-edges.
  In contrast, the sensitivity to co-occurrence statistics was much
  weaker. Our results suggest that a mechanism to spontaneously encode
  positional information from sequences is present in both chimpanzees
  and humans and may represent the default in the absence of training
  and with brief exposure. As many grammatical regularities exhibit
  properties of this mechanism, it may be recruited by language and
  constrain the form that certain grammatical regularities take.},
  doi = {10.1007/s10071-009-0299-8},
  owner = {endress},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0299-8}
  }

• Endress, A. D., & Hauser, M. D.. (2010). Word segmentation with universal prosodic cues. Cognit psychol, 61(2), 177-199.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-cross-seg,
  author = {Ansgar D. Endress and Marc D. Hauser},
  title = {Word segmentation with universal prosodic cues},
  journal = {Cognit Psychol},
  year = {2010},
  volume = {61},
  pages = {177-199},
  number = {2},
  owner = {endress}
  }

• Endress, A. D., & Mehler, J.. (2010). Perceptual constraints in phonotactic learning.. J exp psychol hum percept perform, 36(1), 235–250.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-Phonotactics,
  author = {Ansgar D. Endress and Jacques Mehler},
  title = {Perceptual Constraints in Phonotactic Learning.},
  journal = {J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform},
  year = {2010},
  volume = {36},
  pages = {235--250},
  number = {1},
  month = {Feb}
  }

• Hochmann, J., Endress, A. D., & Mehler, J.. (2010). Word frequency as a cue for identifying function words in infancy. Cognition, 115(3), 444-457.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Hochmann2010,
  author = {Jean-R�my Hochmann and Ansgar D. Endress and Jacques Mehler},
  title = {Word frequency as a cue for identifying function words in infancy},
  journal = {Cognition},
  year = {2010},
  volume = {115},
  pages = {444-457},
  number = {3},
  month = {June},
  abstract = { While content words (e.g., [`]dog') tend to carry meaning, function
  words (e.g., [`]the') mainly serve syntactic purposes. Here, we ask
  whether 17-month old infants can use one language-universal cue to
  identify function word candidates: their high frequency of occurrence.
  In Experiment 1, infants listened to a series of short, naturally
  recorded sentences in a foreign language (i.e., in French). In these
  sentences, two determiners appeared much more frequently than any
  content word. Following this, infants were presented with a visual
  object, and simultaneously with a word pair composed of a determiner
  and a noun. Results showed that infants associated the object more
  strongly with the infrequent noun than with the frequent determiner.
  That is, when presented with both the old object and a novel object,
  infants were more likely to orient towards the old object when hearing
  a label with a new determiner and the old noun compared to a label
  with a new noun and the old determiner. In Experiment 2, infants
  were tested using the same procedure as in Experiment 1, but without
  the initial exposure to French sentences. Under these conditions,
  infants did not preferentially associate the object with nouns, suggesting
  that the preferential association between nouns and objects does
  not result from specific acoustic or phonological properties. In
  line with various biases and heuristics involved in acquiring content
  words, we provide the first direct evidence that infants can use
  distributional cues, especially the high frequency of occurrence,
  to identify potential function words.},
  doi = {DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.006},
  keywords = {Function words}
  }

• Kovács, Á. M., Téglás, E., & Endress, A. D.. (2010). The social sense: susceptibility to others? beliefs in human infants and adults. Science, 330(6012), 1830-1834.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Kovacs-puffo,
  author = {\'Agnes Melinda Kov\'acs and Ern\"o T\'egl\'as and Ansgar D Endress},
  title = {The social sense: susceptibility to others� beliefs in human infants
  and adults},
  journal = {Science},
  year = {2010},
  volume = {330},
  pages = {1830-1834},
  number = {6012},
  owner = {endress},
  timestamp = {2010.10.05}
  }

2009

• Endress, A. D., Cahill, D., Block, S., Jeffrey Watumull, & Hauser, M. D.. (2009). Evidence of an evolutionary precursor to human language affixation in a nonhuman primate. Biol lett, 5(6), 749–751.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-monkey-affixation,
  author = {Ansgar D. Endress and Donal Cahill and Stefanie Block and Jeffrey
  Watumull and Marc D. Hauser},
  title = {Evidence of an evolutionary precursor to human language affixation
  in a nonhuman primate},
  journal = {Biol Lett},
  year = {2009},
  volume = {5},
  pages = {749--751},
  number = {6},
  month = {Dec},
  owner = {endress}
  }

• Endress, A. D., & Hauser, M. D.. (2009). Syntax-induced pattern deafness.. Proc natl acad sci u s a, 106(49), 21001-6.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-SyntaxDeafness,
  author = {Ansgar D Endress and Marc D Hauser},
  title = {Syntax-induced pattern deafness.},
  journal = {Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A},
  year = {2009},
  volume = {106},
  pages = {21001-6},
  number = {49},
  month = {Dec},
  abstract = {Perceptual systems often force systematically biased interpretations
  upon sensory input. These interpretations are obligatory, inaccessible
  to conscious control, and prevent observers from perceiving alternative
  percepts. Here we report a similarly impenetrable phenomenon in the
  domain of language, where the syntactic system prevents listeners
  from detecting a simple perceptual pattern. Healthy human adults
  listened to three-word sequences conforming to patterns readily learned
  even by honeybees, rats, and sleeping human neonates. Specifically,
  sequences either started or ended with two words from the same syntactic
  category (e.g., noun-noun-verb or verb-verb-noun). Although participants
  readily processed the categories and learned repetition patterns
  over nonsyntactic categories (e.g., animal-animal-clothes), they
  failed to learn the repetition pattern over syntactic categories,
  even when explicitly instructed to look for it. Further experiments
  revealed that participants successfully learned the repetition patterns
  only when they were consistent with syntactically possible structures,
  irrespective of whether these structures were attested in English
  or in other languages unknown to the participants. When the repetition
  patterns did not match such syntactically possible structures, participants
  failed to learn them. Our results suggest that when human adults
  hear a string of nouns and verbs, their syntactic system obligatorily
  attempts an interpretation (e.g., in terms of subjects, objects,
  and predicates). As a result, subjects fail to perceive the simpler
  pattern of repetitions-a form of syntax-induced pattern deafness
  that is reminiscent of how other perceptual systems force specific
  interpretations upon sensory input.},
  doi = {10.1073/pnas.0908963106},
  keywords = {, , 19920182},
  owner = {endress},
  pii = {0908963106},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908963106}
  }

• Endress, A. D., & Mehler, J.. (2009). Primitive computations in speech processing. Q j exp psychol, 62(11), 2187–2209.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-AXC-Edge,
  author = {Ansgar D. Endress and Jacques Mehler},
  title = {Primitive computations in speech processing},
  journal = {Q J Exp Psychol},
  year = {2009},
  volume = {62},
  pages = {2187--2209},
  number = {11},
  month = {Nov}
  }

• Endress, A. D., & Mehler, J.. (2009). The surprising power of statistical learning: when fragment knowledge leads to false memories of unheard words. J mem lang, 60(3), 351-367.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-Phantoms,
  author = {Ansgar D. Endress and Jacques Mehler},
  title = {The surprising power of statistical learning: When fragment knowledge
  leads to false memories of unheard words},
  journal = {J Mem Lang},
  year = {2009},
  volume = {60},
  pages = {351-367},
  number = {3},
  owner = {endress}
  }

• Endress, A. D., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J.. (2009). Perceptual and memory constraints on language acquisition. Trends cogn sci, 13(8), 348–353.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-TICS,
  author = {Ansgar D. Endress and Marina Nespor and Jacques Mehler},
  title = {Perceptual and memory constraints on language acquisition},
  journal = {Trends Cogn Sci},
  year = {2009},
  volume = {13},
  pages = {348--353},
  number = {8},
  month = {Aug},
  owner = {endress}
  }

2008

• Toro, J. M., Shukla, M., Nespor, M., & Endress, A. D.. (2008). The quest for generalizations over consonants: asymmetries between consonants and vowels are not the by-product of acoustic differences.. Percept psychophys, 70(8), 1515–1525.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Toro2008-salience,
  author = {Juan M Toro and Mohinish Shukla and Marina Nespor and Ansgar D Endress},
  title = {The quest for generalizations over consonants: asymmetries between
  consonants and vowels are not the by-product of acoustic differences.},
  journal = {Percept Psychophys},
  year = {2008},
  volume = {70},
  pages = {1515--1525},
  number = {8},
  month = {Nov},
  __markedentry = {[endress]},
  abstract = {Consonants and vowels may play different roles during language processing,
  consonants being preferentially involved in lexical processing, and
  vowels tending to mark syntactic constituency through prosodic cues.
  In support of this view, artificial language learning studies have
  demonstrated that consonants (C) support statistical computations,
  whereas vowels (V) allow certain structural generalizations. Nevertheless,
  these asymmetries could be mere by-products of lower level acoustic
  differences between Cs and Vs, in particular the energy they carry,
  and thus their relative salience. Here we address this issue and
  show that vowels remain the preferred targets for generalizations,
  even when consonants are made highly salient or vowels barely audible.
  Participants listened to speech streams of nonsense CVCVCV words,
  in which consonants followed a simple ABA structure. Participants
  failed to generalize this structure over sonorant consonants (Experiment
  1), even when vowel duration was reduced to one third of that of
  consonants (Experiment 2). When vowels were eliminated from the stream,
  participants showed only a marginal evidence of generalizations (Experiment
  4). In contrast, participants readily generalized the structure over
  barely audible vowels (Experiment 3). These results show that different
  roles of consonants and vowels cannot be readily reduced to acoustical
  and perceptual differences between these phonetic categories.},
  doi = {10.3758/PP.70.8.1515},
  institution = {Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, Trieste, Italy.},
  keywords = {Generalization (Psychology); Humans; Phonetics; Reaction Time; Speech
  Acoustics; Speech Perception},
  language = {eng},
  medline-pst = {ppublish},
  owner = {endress},
  pii = {70/8/1515},
  pmid = {19064494},
  timestamp = {2011.01.31},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.8.1515}
  }

• Versace, E., Endress, A. D., & Hauser, M. D.. (2008). Pattern recognition mediates flexible timing of vocalizations in nonhuman primates: experiments with cottontop tamarins. Animal behaviour, 76(6), 1885 – 1892.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Versace2008,
  author = {Elisabetta Versace and Ansgar D. Endress and Marc D. Hauser},
  title = {Pattern recognition mediates flexible timing of vocalizations in
  nonhuman primates: experiments with cottontop tamarins},
  journal = {Animal Behaviour},
  year = {2008},
  volume = {76},
  pages = {1885 -- 1892},
  number = {6},
  abstract = {To maximize transmission in noisy environments, vocalizing animals
  have evolved capacities to avoid the masking effects of biotic and
  abiotic sound sources, such as changing the structure and timing
  of acoustic signals. Here we explore this problem from a new angle,
  asking whether animals can extract predictive acoustic cues from
  an intermittently noisy environment and use this information to guide
  the timing of their vocalizations. In a series of experiments, we
  presented cottontop tamarins, Saguinus oedipus, with loud noise interrupted
  by speech syllables and silence. The silences were either long enough
  to accommodate the full length of their species-specific contact
  calls or too short. The task, in brief, was for tamarins to pick
  out the acoustic cues predicting long versus short gaps of silence,
  and to time their vocalizations to follow cues associated with long
  gaps. Consistently, and across all subjects tested, tamarins were
  able to extract the acoustic cues predicting the long gaps, using
  them to call in the long gaps and consequently, avoiding both the
  energetic and masking costs of calling in noise. We discuss these
  findings and the potential applications of this technique to broader
  questions of pattern recognition and the flexible use of vocal signals
  in a noisy environment.},
  issn = {0003-3472},
  keywords = {auditory learning}
  }

2007

• Endress, A. D., & Bonatti, L. L.. (2007). Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous speech stream. Cognition, 105(2), 247–299.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-AXC,
  author = {Ansgar D. Endress and Luca L. Bonatti},
  title = {Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous
  speech stream},
  journal = {Cognition},
  year = {2007},
  volume = {105},
  pages = {247--299},
  number = {2}
  }

• Endress, A. D., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Mehler, J.. (2007). Perceptual constraints and the learnability of simple grammars. Cognition, 105(3), 577–614.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-Triplets,
  author = {Ansgar D. Endress and Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz and Jacques Mehler},
  title = {Perceptual constraints and the learnability of simple grammars},
  journal = {Cognition},
  year = {2007},
  volume = {105},
  pages = {577--614},
  number = {3},
  month = {Dec}
  }

2005

• Endress, A. D., Scholl, B. J., & Mehler, J.. (2005). The role of salience in the extraction of algebraic rules.. J exp psychol gen, 134(3), 406-19.
  [Bibtex]

  @ARTICLE{Endress-ABCDEFF,
  author = {Ansgar D. Endress and Brian J Scholl and Jacques Mehler},
  title = {The role of salience in the extraction of algebraic rules.},
  journal = {J Exp Psychol Gen},
  year = {2005},
  volume = {134},
  pages = {406-19},
  number = {3},
  abstract = {Recent research suggests that humans and other animals have sophisticated
  abilities to extract both statistical dependencies and rule-based
  regularities from sequences. Most of this research stresses the flexibility
  and generality of such processes. Here the authors take up an equally
  important project, namely, to explore the limits of such processes.
  As a case study for rule-based generalizations, the authors demonstrate
  that only repetition-based structures with repetitions at the edges
  of sequences (e.g., ABCDEFF but not ABCDDEF) can be reliably generalized,
  although token repetitions can easily be discriminated at both sequence
  edges and middles. This finding suggests limits on rule-based sequence
  learning and new interpretations of earlier work alleging rule learning
  in infants. Rather than implementing a computerlike, formal process
  that operates over all patterns equally well, rule-based learning
  may be a highly constrained and piecemeal process driven by perceptual
  primitives--specialized type operations that are highly sensitive
  to perceptual factors. ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).},
  owner = {endress},
  pii = {2005-09704-007}
  }

• Shukla, M., & Endress, A. D.. (2005). Crash blindness in an inveterate apple user: a case study Trieste, Italy: SISSA.
  [Bibtex]

  @TECHREPORT{CrashBlindness,
  author = {Mohinish Shukla and Ansgar D. Endress},
  title = {Crash Blindness in an Inveterate Apple User: A Case Study},
  institution = {SISSA},
  year = {2005},
  address = {Trieste, Italy},
  abstract = {We repor t a brief case study of Crash Blindness in a long-term user
  of the Macintosh computers. The patient (LB), an otherwise normal,
  healthy adult, shows an almost complete blindness to software crashes
  on Macintosh computers. The degree of the pathology appears to correlate
  with the version of the operating system. An MRI shows an atypical
  lesion in the right frontal cor tex, which is the only neurological
  pathology. A comparison is made with other operating systems to show
  the specificity to the Mac OS. The findings are discussed with respect
  to theories of software `Holy Wars'.},
  owner = {endress},
  url = {http://psy.ck.sissa.it/perso/lucapapers/CrashBlindness.pdf}
  }

Chapters

2008

• Mehler, J., Endress, A. D., Gervain, J., & Marina Nespor. (2008). From perception to grammar. In Friederici, A. D., & Thierry, G. (Eds.), In Early language development: bridging brain and behaviour (, Vol. 5, pp. 191–213). Amsterdam: John benjamins.
  [Bibtex]

  @INCOLLECTION{Mehler-Tilar,
  author = {Mehler, Jacques and Ansgar D. Endress and Judit Gervain and Marina
  Nespor},
  title = {From perception to grammar},
  booktitle = {Early Language Development: Bridging Brain and Behaviour},
  publisher = {John Benjamins},
  year = {2008},
  editor = {Friederici, Angela D. and Guillaume Thierry},
  volume = {5},
  series = {rends in Language Acquisition Research (TiLAR)},
  chapter = {8},
  pages = {191--213},
  address = {Amsterdam},
  owner = {endress}
  }

2007

• Mehler, J., Gervain, J., Endress, A. D., & Shukla M.. (2007). Mechanisms of language acquisition: imaging and behavioral evidence. In Nelson, C. A., & Luciana, M. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Mit press.
  [Bibtex]

  @INCOLLECTION{Mehler2007,
  author = {Mehler, J. and Gervain, J. and Endress, A.D. and Shukla, M.,},
  title = {Mechanisms of language acquisition: imaging and behavioral evidence},
  booktitle = {Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience},
  publisher = {MIT Press},
  year = {2007},
  editor = {C. A. Nelson and M. Luciana},
  address = {Cambridge, MA},
  edition = {2nd},
  owner = {endress},
  timestamp = {2015.05.29}
  }

Ph.D. theses

2005

• Endress, A. D.. ((2005). Limitations perceptives et repr?sentationnelles des computations symboliques mentales.). Unpublished unpublished PhD Thesis, Paris, France.
  [Bibtex]

  @PHDTHESIS{Endress-Thesis,
  author = {Ansgar D. Endress},
  title = {Limitations perceptives et repr�sentationnelles des computations
  symboliques mentales},
  school = {�cole des hautes �tudes en sciences sociales},
  year = {2005},
  type = {unpublished},
  address = {Paris, France},
  owner = {endress},
  url = {http://www.lscp.net/persons/endress/publications/endress_thesis.pdf}
  }